<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
  
 <rss version="2.0"
      xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
      xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
      xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
      xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
      xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
      xmlns:html="http://www.w3.org/1999/html"
      xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
      xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/"
      xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
   <channel>
     <title>Benj's tavern</title>
     <link>http://www.grassouille.org/blog/index.php</link>
     <description>The blog with REAL pieces of geek inside!</description>
     <language></language>
     <ttl>60</ttl>
     <admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.grassouille.org/blog/" />
     <admin:errorReportsTo rdf:resource="mailto:bdrieu@april.org" />
  <item>
    <title>We now need a /debian-non-fr archive</title>
    <link>http://www.grassouille.org/blog/index.php//Debian/060630</link>
    <comments>http://www.grassouille.org/blog/index.php//Debian/060630</comments>
    <description>
      
<p/>
<a
href="http://www.eucd.info/index.php?2006/06/30/333-french-parliament-approves-the-worst-copyright-law-in-europe">French
parliament just approved today DADVSI, the worst copyright law in
Europe</a>.
<p/>
For those who don't know about DADVSI, this law is the French version
of <a
href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_Millennium_Copyright_Act">DMCA</a>,
supposedly created to fight against "piracy" and P2P, ended up in
enforcing copyright in the worst way, making illegal previously licit
uses of copyright material, like private copy or making de-facto
illegal things like reading a DVD with free software.  Parts of the
DADVSI, like the so-called <a href="http://www.vivendi.com/">Vivendi
Universal</a> amendment explicitly makes programs than are "obviously"
made to share illegally copyrighted material (sic, lawyers will have
fun determining if a webserver is "obviously" a copyrighted material
sharing program).  Making available such programs will be of course
illegal and debians mirrors will risk three years of jail ... will
Debian continue shipping <a
href="http://packages.debian.org/amule">amule</a> on its French
mirrors?
<p/>
As a conclusion for this months long fight that proved majority does
not care neither about democratic procedures nor the 170.000 citizens
that signed the EUCD.INFO petition, we still has a chance
constitutional council declares DADVSI as anti-constitutional.
<p/>
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nineteen_Eighty-Four">Scary</a>,
heh?

    </description>
    <category domain="http://www.grassouille.org/blog/index.php">/Debian</category>
    <dc:creator>bdrieu@april.org</dc:creator>
    <pubdate>Fri Jun 30 2006 23:00</pubdate>
  </item>
   </channel>
 </rss>
