<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
  
 <rss version="2.0"
      xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
      xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
      xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
      xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
      xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
      xmlns:html="http://www.w3.org/1999/html"
      xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
      xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/"
      xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
   <channel>
     <title>Benj's tavern</title>
     <link>http://www.grassouille.org/blog/index.php</link>
     <description>The blog with REAL pieces of geek inside!</description>
     <language></language>
     <ttl>60</ttl>
     <admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.grassouille.org/blog/" />
     <admin:errorReportsTo rdf:resource="mailto:bdrieu@april.org" />
  <item>
    <title>You are too elite to use my crap</title>
    <link>http://www.grassouille.org/blog/index.php//Debian/060204</link>
    <comments>http://www.grassouille.org/blog/index.php//Debian/060204</comments>
    <description>
      
<p/>
<a href="
http://lambdaman.blogspot.com/2006/02/silly-keyboard-users.html">Daniel</a>,
I'm afraid you are guilty of <em>Argumentum ad populum</em>.  
<p/>
I would really like to see those millions of Gnome users confused by
this small white square called a GtkTextEntry that every gnome zealot
invokes when asked why keyboard support disappeared from a lot of
Gnome features.
<p/>
What is funny is that the very Gnome Human Interface Guidelines ask
not to <em>[...] Limit Your User Base</em> and that is exactly what
the Gnome developers do.  Stating that a typical Gnome user does not
want keyboard is simply false.  My own experience let me think a
substantial part of Gnome users want <b>both</b> (and the Ctrl-L
thingy does not count as keyboard support, it is just crap).
<p/>
I would perfectly understand Gnome developers prefer it this way,
after all it is their choice.  But don't say it is for users sake.
And be prepared to loose many users with <em>unique</em> needs.

    </description>
    <category domain="http://www.grassouille.org/blog/index.php">/Debian</category>
    <dc:creator>bdrieu@april.org</dc:creator>
    <pubdate>Sat Feb 04 2006 16:00</pubdate>
  </item>
   </channel>
 </rss>
